Saturday, February 10, 2018

Cupid's advice to Christian women about how to avoid abusive relationship #1

Hi, I am cupid :)
My Resume...oh, I don't know just the god of love, marriage and relationship for at least the last 2000 years?

Cupid's Advice Number 1

The biggest flaw of Christian women is they are so desperate to have a man, many would put up with abuse, just to have a man. Because the teaching of their religion believes it is wrong for a woman to be single.

So, advice number one, the teaching of your bible is wrong. There is nothing wrong about been single. And it is better to be single and wait for the right guy to come along, then to be in an abusive relationship. And even if you cannot find Mr. Right, it better to be single and have a life, then to be in a relationship with somebody that is abusive. As for the fear of having no kids to take care of you when you get old…I got a secret for you, I invented sperm banks just for those girls who wants a baby, but can’t find Mr. Right!

(Once upon a time, when you are not ready for sperm bank technology, I invented polygamy, now, you are ready for this technology, I am using sperm banks, which work better, to replace polygamy) 

Your destiny and your true love, is in the grand design of the cosmos. If something is meant to be your's, it is your, if something that is not meant to be your, it is not meant to be your and obsess about trying to force something not your, to become your, can only cause you pain and lead you to miss out, on all those beautiful things out there that is your and let all the happiness, you got, slide through your finger and pass you by.

It is alright for a girl wanting to have a man, but don't be obsess with it, when it is time to let go, it is time to let go. 

(PS: And here is a secret, good girls who are patient and not obsess with having a man, got a better chance to find Mr. Right. Girls that are not patient and jump on board with the first guy she find and so obsess with having a man, she is afraid to break up, when the relationship is not right, are lease likely to find Mr. Right and more likely to end up in abusive relationships, because more often then less, your Mr. Right is not the first guy that comes along, when you are single, he might even be somebody who comes along, when you are desperately clinching onto a relationship, just to have a man and the first guy that comes along or that relationship you are so desperate to clinch onto, due to the fear of having no man, might turn out to be abusive)

(PPS: Even when a relationship is not abusive, clinching onto a relationship that is not right, just to have a man, is unfair to both you and your partner. Because you deserve to be with somebody you want to be with, somebody you are happy to be with and your partner, deserve to be with somebody, who is with him, because she wants to be with him, not somebody who is with him, simply because she is afraid to be single.)

Tuesday, February 6, 2018

Is Age of Enlightenment product of Confucius influence undermining Christian value? (Mini video documentary series)

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

Part 6

Part 7

Part 8

Yours Truly
Mr. 666 (No bullshit, my birth sign really is 666, born on the sixth of June 6:00AM)

Wednesday, October 11, 2017

Evidence that suggest Roman persecuted Christian is one big lie

For a long time, we hear the Christian story of Christian been persecuted by the evil Roman, for doing the work of god. But is it real? Well, there are increase evidence suggest, not only is it a lie. Instead, Christians were the one who were the real trouble makers. 

We all hear of things such as Inquisition and Crusades during the era where the Catholic Church rule the western world, but evidence suggest these problems exist even in the Roman era, only then the Roman was more powerful, thus, Christian fanatics only get to act like terrorists. 

According to academic Cailian Davenport whose research is funded by the Australia Research Council, there are 0 evidence of Roman persecuting Christians. Roman Emperor Trajan which the Christian world accuse of killing Christians for not worshiping Roman gods, actually once wrote an Imperial decree saying if Christian is not to worship Roman gods, they are not to be punished. In fact, the Roman Empire was known to be an Empire with many different religions and different part of the world, yet, not even once did the Romans every persecuted anybody for not worshiping the religion of Rome. The accusing of Roman throwing Christians into the arena to be eaten by lions, but there are no evidence of that, instead, as we know, people of the ancient days, tend to be more brutal in their execution, the idea is to make such a brutal death a public display, to set an example, to the rest of the people saying "If you committed a crime, you would die via such a brutal method also", And in ancient Rome, get eaten by hungry lions, is simply a form of death penalty, for certain crimes and just because somebody is a Christian, it doesn't mean, he won't be a criminal, conducting crimes such as theft, murder, rape etc. 

With greater reform to the Catholic Church today, since pope Francis took over, even on a Catholic news website, there is a paper published by Charles Mercier questioning whether Emperor Nero really persecuted Christians?

A paper published by Princeton University Professor Brent D. Shaw, also talk about there are no evidence of Romans persecuting Christians, especially, not by Emperor Nero, whom Christianity accused of  been the biggest butcher of Christians. Although there were cases of Emperor Nero executing some Christians for causing the great fire of Rome, it is important to note Emperor Nero never say to execute Christians, instead it said to execute those who cause the fire, if amount those who cause the fire is a group of Christians, naturally they would be executed, but that is not to say Nero executed all Christians. To say that is like saying, Obama bombing ISIS and Taliban today, is Obama bombing and persecuting Muslims. 

So, where did this whole idea of Roman persecuting Christian come from. First, the problem could be within the bible and Christianity itself. Let's take a few examples, 

[Thou shalt not delay to offer the first of thy ripe fruits and of thy liquors: the firstborn of thy sons shalt thou give unto me] (Exodus 22:29)

[The Lord said to Moses "You and Eleazar the priest and the family heads of the community are to count all the people and animals that were captured. Divide the spoils equally between the soldiers who took part in the battle and the rest of the community. From the soldiers who took part in the battle, set apart as tribute for the Lord one out of every five hundred, whether people, cattle, donkeys or sheep. Take this tribute from their half share and give it to Eleazar the priest as the Lord's part. From the Israelites' half, select one out of every fifty, whether people cattle donkeys, sheep or other animals. Give them to the Levites, who are responsible for the care of the Lord's tabernacle. So, Moses and Eleazar the priest did as the Lord commanded Moses. The plunder remaining from the spoils that the soldiers took was 675000 sheep, 72000 cattle, 61000 donkeys and 32000 women who had never slept with a man. The half share of those who fought in the battle was 337500 sheep of which the tribute for the Lord was 375, 36000 cattle of which the tribute for the Lord was 72, 30500 donkeys of which the tribute for the Lord was 61 16000 people of whom the tribute for the Lord was 32.] (Number 31:25~40)

So, despite there are many Christians who claim and believe Christianity is anti-human sacrifice, it is not true, in fact, human sacrifice is an important part of traditional Christian ritual. The idea that Jesus is the ultimate sacrifice to substitute for all sacrifice of all past and future, isn't added into the religion later and it was most likely added by the Romans, in an effort to end human sacrificing amount those early Christians. Rome on the other hand by the era of Juliet Cease, has already outlawed human sacrifice. In Roman paintings there were images of Christians sacrificing their first-born child to the god of Christianity, for many faithful Christians, this have traditionally to be thought of as anti-Christian lies and propaganda, created by the Roman, yet, we are finding within the bible, of Exodus 22:29, where the bible word by word, order Christians to sacrifice their first-born child, to the god of Christianity, upon their birth. This would naturally have led those Christian who sacrifice their first born, to be arrested and punished to the full extent of Roman laws, which, could involve, getting eating by lions in the gladiator arena. 

Let's take another example from the bible

 [But if this charge is true (that she wasn't a virgin on her wedding night) and evidence of the girl's virginity is not found, they shall bring the girl to the entrance of her father's house and there her townsman shall stone her to death, because she committed a crime against Israel by her unchasteness in her father's house. Thus, shall you purge the evil from your midst.] (Deuteronomy 22:20~21)

Now, Rome was an era of sexual liberation, even today in the 21st century, we find it outrage to persecute women for pre-marital sex, let along the extremely sexually liberal Roman Empire. So, is it hard to image, the outrage of Romans, when they see Christians executing women, for having pre-marital sex, in the exact same way, we people today, would be outrage by it? Probably more outrage then we are? So, what would happen to those Christians, who killed the unwed none virgin woman? They will be given the death penalty, thus nail onto the cross or thrown into the gladiator arena to be eaten by lions. 

Let's take another passage from the bible as example

[They entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their fathers, with all their heart and soul; and everyone who would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, was to be put to death, whether small or great, whether man or woman] (Chronicles 15:12~13)

Image a Muslim walk down the streets of the US and killed people for not been a Muslim, would we not execute them. So, what would the Romans do to a Christian who kill people for not been a Christians. The death penalty style, is probably worst then eaten by lion or nail to the cross. According to written record, the people who caused the great Roman fire, Emperor Nero order for them to be skinned alive, before been fed to the lions. 

So, why the Christians still say Romans are persecuting Christians? This is within an important Christian value, Christianity believe the god of Christianity is always right, so, these Christians extremists do not see what they are doing to be evil, but doing something good and just, so, when Romans kill them for doing such evil thing, in their views, the Romans are killing them for doing something good and just, thus, persecution of Christians. In addition, it is important to note, within the bible there are multiple passage that talk about Christians would be persecuted for doing the work of the Christian god. Most Christians, today, thought that is just spreading the religion, but, considering what the bible teach, is it not surprising there are Christians who see killing none Christians, killing non virgins and child sacrifice to be doing the work of the Christian god back then, even today in the 21st century, what about all those Christians fanatics who goes on angry protests saying "god hate fags" and "kill all gays" don't they think what they are doing, to be doing the work of the Christian god and doing something good and just? 

It can also be propaganda, much like how in modern China, the Communist propaganda claim it is the Communist party who defeated Japan in WW2, in the face of the Republic government tyranny and persecution, despite all evidence and people who went through WW2 in China, would tell you it is a lie. And despite we cannot denier during the 19th century, Europe did lots of bad thing, in China the Communist Party fixation on it, a great deal, to create anti western feeling in China. When the Catholic Church was in power, they also need to construct an evil tyrant for the Christians to struggle against and that they chose, was the Romans and Emperor Nero. 

It is also important to note, unlike most ancient countries, where the King or Emperor hold 110% of all legislative power, Roman legislative power compose of both Emperor and Senate, which is where the modern democracy's legislative system is model after. So, Emperor Nero, cannot possibly outlaw Christianity and sentence all people to death for been Christians, even if he wanted to, due to he needed Senate approval, to pass any laws, which make Nero mass murder Christians, even less likely. 

So, what happened in ancient Rome, was not a case of Romans persecuting Christians, it is Christian fanatics doing major act of evil and horror to others, such as mass murder and terrorism and were executed for it and they accuse Romans for persecuting Christians for it.

It is much like how Islamic fanatics today, are getting bomb by the US and its allies, for September Eleven attack and all their terrorist actions, but, in their view, they did nothing wrong and is accusing the US and its allies for persecuting Muslims for it.

Friday, September 15, 2017

Why women should worship Satan rather the Yahweh?

Despite in the west there is a stereotype saying "The west treat women well and none west treat women like crap"and further stereotypical view in regards to how the none west treat women e.g. the stereotype of "Asia is a society where the husband is like a King and wife is like a servant, while the west in comparison treat women as equals" In reality, very frequently while conducting objective study to the issue, not only do we find, there are 0% element of truth to any of these stereotype, For example most westerners who been to East Asia would tell you the whole concept of "Asia is a society where the husband is like a King and wife is like a servant, while the west in comparison treat women as equals" is nothing more then a bunch of bullshit, invented by racists people, some went further saying "In fact, in comparison, to East Asia, the west got much catching up to do, to East Asia, in regards to the maturity of gender equality" and this was even more the case, prior to today, for example, many western elites during the 18th century, such as Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, praise Asian husbandry, saying western husbands got much to learn from East Asian husband

Now, we are not going to evaluate whether the claim of "Asia is a society where the husband is like a King and wife is like is like a servant" is true or not, nor are we going to evaluate whether the claim of "the west got much catching up to do, to East Asia, in regards to the maturity of gender equality"to be true either, this is just something that is important to point out, because when we start flaw of how bible treat women there are going to be people start saying "Oh yeah? If you think we treat women bad, then you should go to the none west, which treat women even worse", so we need to point out, the idea of "The west treat women well and none west treat women like crap" and "Asia is a society where the husband is like a King and wife is like a servant, while the west in comparison treat women as equals" are nothing more then stereotypes invented by white supremacists, to sustain the idea of white people are superior, a concept they very much invented out of thin air.

Now having said that, within the bible the status of women, is even lower, then that within the stereotype of "husband is like a King and wife is like a servant", it goes as far as inferring the idea that "a wife is the property of her husband to do as he please and the wife is less then just the servant of her husband, but the slave of her husband, to do as he please, even if the husband tell her to eat rat poison to kill herself, she must do it." and despite the bible says a husband should not be harsh with his wife, it didn't specify what it meant by "not harsh" and the bible also wrote if the wife accidentally touched the penis of another man, while helping her husband to fight another man, the husband must then cut off his wife's hand, meaning, what the bible consider as "not harsh" is still very harsh, it also said if you fancy the wife of others, just defeat them, then you can take their wife as your own.

As a result, until the turn of 19th century, men pimping out their wife, to other men, is not an uncommon practice and till the 19th century, men selling their wife, in public auctions, within the market, is a common practice in many western country. Behavior like these only become outlaw, by 19th century, (which is probably one of the reason 18th century, western elite think the husbandry in Asia was better, considering such behavior is never legal in known East Asian history)

And during the middle ages, stealing another man's wife is much easier, unlike today, where you actually need to try to get her to start liking you and left her husband, back in those days, you fancy another man's wife, all you need to do, is able to defeat him and then that man's wife, is now rightfully your's regardless to whether she wants to (and not necessary even the other man's wife, if he wants, he can simply have you as his mistress or make you a prostitute, with him as your pimp) And if you think it is always the scene of two knights dual over a woman, it is not necessary the case, it might just as well be a rich man, using his financial wealth to defeat another man and take his wife via force, thus, those romantic scene from the romance novels, girls like so much, where a young couple very much in love and very happy together until a rich old Count who fancy his wife, took his wife via force and there is nothing the husband can do about it and that is still a romanticized version of this story, when that happen in reality, the taken woman, probably only get to be a mistress, or worse, been sold off in the market or been forced into prostitution.

So, what are further reason women should worship Satan and Anti Christ over Yahweh. Read the following two previous post of this blog that explain, what is the Anti Christ and what is Satan

Having said that, let's take a look at some of the bible passages, that infer such behavior is the right thing to do.

"When men strive together one with another, and the wife of the one draweth near for to deliver her husband out of the hand of him that smiteth him, and putteth forth her hand, and taketh him by the secrets: then thou shalt cut off her hand, thine eye shall not pity her." (Deuteronomy 25:11-12)

"But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God." (I Corinthians 11:3)

"For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man." (I Corinthians 11:8-9)

"Behold, here is my daughter a maiden, and his concubine; them I will bring out now, and humble ye them, and do with them what seemeth good unto you: but unto this man do not so vile a thing. But the men would not hearken to him: so the man took his concubine, and brought her forth unto them; and they knew her, and abused her all the night until the morning: and when the day began to spring, they let her go." (Judges 19:24-25)

"Let the women learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression." (I Timothy 2:11-14)

"Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything." (Ephesians 5:22-24)

"Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church." (I Corinthians 14:34-35)

"A silent and loving woman is a gift of the Lord: and there is nothing so much worth as a mind well instructed. A shamefaced and faithful woman is a double grace, and her continent mind cannot be valued." (Eccles. 26:14-15)

"A shameless woman shall be counted as a dog; but she that is shamefaced will fear the Lord." (Eccles.26:25)

1 Timothy 2:9-15 

Likewise also that women should adorn themselves in respectable apparel, with modesty and self-control, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly attire, but with what is proper for women who profess godliness—with good works. Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve; ...

Ephesians 5:22-24 

Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands.

And so train the young women to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled, pure, working at home, kind, and submissive to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be reviled.

Colossians 3:18 

Wives, submit to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.

1 Peter 3:1-22 

Likewise, wives, be subject to your own husbands, so that even if some do not obey the word, they may be won without a word by the conduct of their wives, when they see your respectful and pure conduct. Do not let your adorning be external—the braiding of hair and the putting on of gold jewelry, or the clothing you wear— but let your adorning be the hidden person of the heart with the imperishable beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which in God's sight is very precious. For this is how the holy women who hoped in God used to adorn themselves, by submitting to their own husbands, ...

Case Study: Abuse inside Christian marriages – a personal story

At this stage it is fair to assume, there would be those who attack the Middle East saying they treat women better and the higher ratio of white men/Asian women couple, to sustain the idea of west treat women better. To such extend. This article firstly must point out, in its experience with Arabic women, there are many who fail to stereotype of the oppressed Arabic women, some are very liberal, sexy and stylish, there are many Arabic women that express the view that, despite the Middle East got some problem in regards to gender equality, to say the entire Arabic world suppress women, is like saying the entire western world are angry Christian fanatics that wants to kill all gays, base on those Christian fanatics that goes on angry protest saying "God hate fags" Further more, according to research of the US justice department, more women become victim of abuse in the hand of a Christian husband, then that of a Muslim husband.

In regards to the higher ratio of white men/Asian women couple, there are also some studies into it. This is due to, firstly, much like western women seen French and Italian men to be a romance symbol. Many Asian women today, see the west as a romance symbol. In a survey of 100 Taiwanese women, it found 100% is interest in been in an casual none committed relationship with a white man at some stage, but only 1% is interest in been in a serious committed relationship with western male. The main reason, is that the girls sees white men as a romance symbol, thus, good boy friend material. But they see white men to be irresponsible and unreliable, thus, horrible husband material. However, as we all know, sometimes casual relationships turns into serious relationships. This is especially obvious in romance drama and theme weddings. Christian theme wedding is very popular in Japan, usually involving a white man dressing up as a Christian priest, the man does not need to be a real priest, but must be white and even if he is a real priest, he won't make the cut, if he isn't white and the venue must be decorated to look like a romanticize version of Christian church, it does not need to be a real church, but must be a romanticize ideal of a church, if it is a real church, it won't make the cut, if it does not fit the romanticized image. In Taiwan's romantic comedy, nearly all wedding is a romanticized Christian wedding, despite Christians only make up 5% of Taiwan's population and in reality Christian wedding make up less then 5% of all weddings.

Furthermore, the greater majority of Asians that live in the west, are from China, but after 70 years of Communist propaganda, most younger generation of Chinese, believe none Chinese women won't be interest in them, thus, they don't even try, in addition, due to the effect of those same Communist propaganda, Chinese who are not as well educated, prefer to stay in a little circle with only Chinese. Communist propaganda have for the past 70 years been saying "those of same heritage, culture and race are our people, those of other heritage, culture and race are the others" and "all people of different heritage, culture and racial groups want to kill Chinese people, so, Chinese people must unite against them." This is similar the traditional pro racists western view of "those of same race is our people, those of other race is our enemy", which is still commonly believe amount KKK and the ISIS value of "those of same religion is our people and those of other religion are the enemy." As a result, Chinese men pursuing white women, is much less common then white men pursuing Chinese women and the greater majority of Asians in western countries today, are Chinese.

In addition, in the post feminism era, many conservative Christian men, who still believe in the Christian value of "a wife should serve and be submissive", start preferring Asian women, due to their believe of "Asia is a society where the husband is like a King and wife is like a servant" saying stuff such as "unlike western women, Asian women still know a wife should be submissive and serve her husband" and with the exception of Asian women, who live in the west, for longer period of time, thus, would outright, veto dating such men (in fact 50% of Asian women, who lived in the west, refuse dating western men, to prevent coming across western men of such type as a "it is better to be wrong then sorry" policy) Asian women who don't live in the west or live in the west for a shorter period of time, won't know of such issue in the west, thus, more likely to accept the pursued of such western men.

Despite the teaching of Yahweh say, he is the one and only true god and all other gods are evil demonic false gods pretending to be god AKA Satan. I say it is Yahweh who is truly the evil demonic false god pretending to be god and the Satanic gods are the real gods.

In the name of the Great and Mighty Satanic Goddess Aphrodite and her son the Great and Mighty Satanic God Cupid! I command you the demon Yahweh, to leave the women of this world along! For your false idea of marriage, is a haunt on every soul of the world! A haunt on every man, woman and children of this world! And a haunt on every family on this world!  HAIL SATAN! HAIL SATAN! HAIL SATAN!

Tuesday, September 12, 2017

Is the United States really a Christian nation?

Without a doubt the US is currently the most powerful nation in the world and some modern American politician claim the US is a Christian nation. But is America really a Christian nation?

Let's explore this together.

President Thomas Jefferson on Christianity and the bible

Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity.

-Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 1782

But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.

-Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 1782

Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because if there be one he must approve of the homage of reason more than that of blindfolded fear.

-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 10, 1787

I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever in religion, in philosophy, in politics, or in anything else where I was capable of thinking for myself. Such an addiction is the last degradation of a free and moral agent.

-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Francis Hopkinson, March 13, 1789

The whole history of these books [the Gospels] is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills.

-Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, January 24, 1814

In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own.

-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Horatio G. Spafford, March 17, 1814

Man once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities the most monstrous, and like a ship without rudder, is the sport of every wind.

-Thomas Jefferson to James Smith, 1822.

It is between fifty and sixty years since I read it [the Apocalypse], and I then considered it merely the ravings of a maniac, no more worthy nor capable of explanation than the incoherences of our own nightly dreams.

-Thomas Jefferson, letter to General Alexander Smyth, Jan. 17, 1825

Sunday, September 10, 2017

Why more and more historians believe Jesus never existed?

More and more historians are pointing out evidence suggesting Jesus never existed. So, what lead them to this conclusion. Today, lets watch a few lecture from some historians and why they came to this conclusion. Even I have not watch the videos yet, lets watch it together :)

Cupid's advice to Christian women about how to avoid abusive relationship #1

Hi, I am cupid :) My Resume...oh, I don't know just the god of love, marriage and relationship for at least the last 2000 years? ...