Tuesday, April 17, 2018

Pagan ritual: How to communicate with the "REAL" Gods

Since the rise of the Yahweh faith in the western world, there was continue suppression, of other religion believe and forcing people to worship Yahweh as the one and only true god. It is almost as if facing a tyrant with a thirst for power and trying to secure that power to rule through tyranny.

In religions of the Yahweh faith, it refer to all other gods as evil demonic false gods, pretending to be god, AKA Satan. While considering some of the stuff, the bible teach, such as mass murder of gays and its disturbing teaching of making it alright for a man to rape a woman, if he is willing to pay her father 40 pieces of silver, but if a woman have pre marital sex they execute her for been a slut. The list of disturbing bible teaching goes on, not to mention, the only dynasty that follow the teaching of the bible, with the Vatican city in charge, the end result of following the teaching of the bible is 1000 years of dark ages, inquisition, meaningless religion wars and the black plagued lasted for 100 years, while when plague emerged in many other parts of the world, (e.g. China), it can be place under control and dealt with much quicker, because according to the teaching of the bible, education is a sin you are only allow to study the bible, conducting original research and study materials of none biblical source is a sin, so, when the black plague strike, people only went to the church and prey.

proverb 3:5 Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding;

It can even be argued that, while the teaching of the Yahweh faith claim, Yahweh is the one and only true god and all other gods are evil demonic false gods pretending to be god, AKA Satan. It is those other gods, which are the real god and Yahweh is the evil demonic false god pretending to be god.

So, today we will talk about a pagan ritual in regards to how to communicate with the gods, the "REAL' gods.

Unlike the western world, which is unfortunate and got conquer by the Yahweh cult, Asia by fortune, was never conquer by it. Don't get me wrong, there was a few attempts in history, but every time Asia won, but usually at very high price. In China it included the Yellow Turban Rebellion 黃巾賊  that occurred between the 184AD~205AD, the Yahweh followers' revolt attempt was an ultimate failure. But the aftermath of the war, also saw the raise of warlords in China, leading to the collapse of the Han Dynasty as warlord Cao Cao holding the Emperor as a puppet and appointed himself Prime Minister, leading to a largest civil war in China, with governor of the Southern State refusing to recognize the authority of Cao Cao. The next recorded attempt of Yahweh follower revolt is the Ming cult 明教 More evidence today, prove, the Ming cult is a Yahweh cult, during the Song dynasty between 10th~13th century, they made 2 revolt attempt, in Southern China and was defeated, but the cost to China, was that it also contribute to China been vulnerable and was conquer by the Mongol Empire. Later in the 14th century, rebel leaders, first ally with the Ming cult, to fight the Mongols, even been baptists, to be followers of the religion and established the Ming Empire, but then, they betray the Ming cult, letting them been destroy by the Mongols, when their army is no longer needed and to prove to Ming cult followers, Yahweh is a false god, they forced nuns of Ming cult into prostitution and when the people see that Yahweh didn't punish them for forcing these nuns to be prostitutes, the remaining Ming cult followers abandon the cult, afterwards, the new Kingdom established by the rebels, was still call the Ming Empire, despite in reality, it no longer got nothing to do with the Yahweh cult. The third attempt recorded took place in Japan, where Japanese that converted to Catholic, under the order of the pope, tried to revolt but also fail, in the aftermath, Japan refuse all trade and contact with foreign nations, except China, until the 19th century. The final attempt, was the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom 太平天國, in 19th century China, over 1 million people died in the war, the war was so costly for the Chinese that China started becoming vulnerable to the European powers, in the aftermath.

But what that also mean, is the Yahweh cult never become mainstream in Asia, thus, pagan religion continue to be mainstream till date. As explained in previous article, of this blog. The main gods of all pagan religion in the world are the same and they all got the same origin, from ancient Africa, before the first human left Africa and when the first human left Africa, they bring their religion believe with them to all parts of the world and then throughout the world, the religion believes started evolving independently. Thus, all pagan religion are the same and the gods of all pagan religion are in fact the same gods, been interpreted differently by people of different area. (For more info, please read the previous article "Why should we support Satan and Lucifer, over Christian god Yahweh" on this blog

So, today, we will be teaching you a method in regards to how the Chinese Pagan religion Taoism communicate with a god. This is a most simple process, even those who are not priests or priestesses can do. Because, as I explain before the gods of all pagan religions are the same gods, this same method that is used to communicate with Taoism pagan gods, can also be used to communicate with western Pagan gods, such as Athena, Thor, Zeus etc, due to they are in reality the same gods, as the Chinese Taoism Pagan gods. In East Asia this method of Taoism, is been used, also by some Buddhists, to ask Buddhism gods questions.

This is use by an instrument call 擲筊 which to the best knowledge of this article, does not have an English name, so, we will translate it directly from Chinese call it "throwing Zhixiao". Like a penny, a Zhixiao have a head side and a tail side. Zhixiao comes in pairs, with two identical Zhixiao, as shown in the image below


As an alternative to Zhixiao, something else that got both a head side and a tail side, can be use as substitution e.g. two coins.


When you are to ask the gods a question, ask the gods in a prayer, but hold the Zhixiao between your hands, afterwards, open your palm and let it drop to the ground.

If you get one head and one tail, as shown in the image below, and you manage to get one head and one tail, three times in a row, it means the gods say yes, however, it only mean the gods say yes, if you get this same result three times in a row.

If your drop result, show as the image below, it mean the gods disapprove of what you are asking, it might even mean, the gods are angry at you, for having such consideration




If your drop result is, as shown below it means that gods are not sure what you are asking or the gods will consider your request, but is not giving you an answer for now.





When you are using coins as substitution, due to the limitation, all you can say is that, if you get one head and one tail three times in a row, within the drop, it means the gods say yes. Otherwise, it means either the gods are not answering, not sure what you are talking about or the gods says no.





The video below can demonstrate to westerners how to ask the "REAL" gods a question, using the Taoism method



There have actually been some cases that make it into the news, that really seem to be miracle from the gods, using this method

In the video below, things got really odd. A person went into a temple and to ask the god a question, he threw down the Zhixiao, at first throw the result isn't one head and one tail, but after the two Zhixiao hit the ground and stop, suddenly one Zhixiao jumped up from the ground and flipped around, to give a Yes answer. Even the temple priest said, this is the first time, he ever seen something like this, after been a priest for so many years. The entire process got recorded on a smart phone and put onto youtube





PS: According to statistic Christians have the highest rate of abuse towards women in the world, as a result, the western world got the highest rate of abuse towards women, despite the general believe is the western world got the lowest rate of abuse towards women. Many of the reason, is directly the result of the teaching of the bible. This blog, wrote a series of advice to Christian women, about how to deal with this issue under the title of "Cupid's advice to Christian women about how to avoid abusive relationship)

Because Cupid is really the Roman and Greek god of love and marriage, after writing the first advice, this blog used this pagan method, to ask Cupid whether he approve of this advice. Because we don't have Zhixiao, so, we use two coins as substitution. And guess, what, we made three throws in a row and all three throws, we got one head and one tail, meaning, Cupid approve.

Read the Cupid approved message of: Cupid's advice to Christian women about how to avoid abusive relationship #1

(For the other advice, we didn't used the Zhixiao ritual to ask whether Cupid approve. We only asked Cupid's approval for the first advice. Because this is one, we know for certain Cupid would approve of)

Tuesday, April 3, 2018

Cupid's advice to Christian women about how to avoid abusive relationship #2


Hi, I am cupid :)
My Resume...oh, I don't know just the god of love, marriage and relationship for at least the last 2000 years?

Cupid's Advice Number 8

As a Christian, since your childhood you have been taught that once you get marry, you should marry for life, regardless of circumstances. Due to a great deal of passages within the bible that is anti-divorce. 

Some of these bible passages include

Luke 16:18 
“Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries a woman divorced from her husband commits adultery.

Corinthians 7:10-11 
To the married I give this charge (not I, but the Lord): the wife should not separate from her husband (but if she does, she should remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband), and the husband should not divorce his wife.

Matthew 5:32 
But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

Matthew 19:6 
So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.”

Romans 7:2 
For a married woman is bound by law to her husband while he lives, but if her husband dies she is released from the law of marriage.

Well, firstly, the teaching of the bible is wrong. There is nothing wrong about divorces. Also, there is nothing wrong about adultery, as long as its consensual (unless you are cheating on your partner. But it is alright for you to cheat on your partner if e.g. your partner is abusive and it is alright to cheat on your boy friend if e.g. he is married)

Like everybody I know sometime it is hard to let go, of a love and especially children, there is nothing harder for them, then to see their parents divorce. But either way, there is nothing wrong about divorces and sometime, it might be the best course of action, maybe not just for you, but also for your partner and your children. 

When it is the wrong person, 
1. An early break up is better then a late breakup
2. An early divorce is better then a late divorce
3. A break up is better then a divorce
4. Break up/Divorce before having kids, is better then break up/divorce after having kids

In addition Cupid love the following YouTube video made by a Buddhist monk about marriage. It contradict the bible completely, but it presented a much healthier attitude, then that of the bible and Cupid would recommend you use the teaching of this video to substitute the teaching of the bible, in regards to marriage.

Because the video is in Chinese, Cupid will translate it into English and show the video below the translation

Marriage destiny is already decided by karma

Why people in the ancient days, can easier keep their marriage vows? It is because they believe their destiny as husband and wife is determined by Karma,

Life is like a train, driving towards your grave. 

While riding along this train, you would meet lots of train stops.

Nobody is meant to be on this train with you, for your entire journey. whether it is your family, friends or lover.

You will see people come and go, getting on and off this train. 

If you are lucky somebody will accompany for a period of the journey, but when he/she is going to get off the train, even if it is hard to let go, you should still be grateful, then wave and say goodbye, because in the next stop there will be somebody else that will accompany you to go further....

1. The taste of coffee is not about how you stir it, but whether you put in sugar. A painful pass, is not about how to forget it, but whether you got the courage to start again. 

2. Somebody who chase after two bunnies in the same time, ended up not catching either.  Don't be greedy and try have it all, don't try to know everything, don't try to be superman, focus on what you do best and do it.

3. Everybody is a bitten apple, all got imperfection. Some people got bigger imperfection, because heaven love him/her more. 

4. The same bottle water, cost $3.00 at 7/11, but cost $30.00 in a five star restaurant.  A lot of times, the value of a person is determined by the position

5. A relationship between 2 people are like a sweater. when you are making it, you need to put it together one stich at a time, you need to be careful and it take time. But when you are destroying it, you only need to pull it sofetly. 

6. Marriage isn't 1+1 =2, but it is 0.5+0.5=1, both people take away part of their imperfection and then add together to form a perfect union. 

7. There are four questions in life: School, Career, Marriage and Family. What qualify as a passing grade, is whether the average score is a pass. Don't spend too much energy on a single question. 

8. A lifetime, can be consider as both long and short. charish those who are by your side, once they pass you by, they pass you by. Charish those who are currently by yourside


(This article really used pagan ritual in regards to how asking the gods a question, to ask the Roman God Cupid, whether he approve this advice and the advice is approved by Cupid according to such ritual)





Sunday, March 25, 2018

Cupid's advice to Christian women about how to avoid abusive relationship #3~#8



Hi, I am cupid :)
My Resume...oh, I don't know just the god of love, marriage and relationship for at least the last 2000 years?



Advice number 2

Follow on from advice number 1, I know despite how much I tell women, there is nothing wrong about been single, there are still going to be some Christian women that are so obsessed with having a man, they rather put up with an abusive relationship, then to be single

Thus, Cupid would give you advice number 2

The western world got a horrible dating and relationship culture. Typically, the relationship and dating world can be split into number of stages. First it can be split into

Stage 1: Single/None Committed Relationship Stage
Stage 2: Couple/Committed Relationship Stage

The Single/None Relationship Committed Stage can again be split into 2 stages
Stage 1: Just friends Stage
Stage 2: Just Dating Stage

The Just Dating Stage can again be split into 2 Stages
Stage 1: Just Dating None Exclusively Stage
Stage 2: Just Dating Exclusively Stage

The Couple/Committed Relationship Stage can again be split into two stages
Stage 1: Just Lovers Stage
Stage 2: Spouse Stage

The Spouse Stage can again be split into two stages
Stage 1: De facto Stage
Stage 2: Married Stage


Definition/Nature of each stage
Stage 1:
 Single/
None
Committed
Relationship
 Stage 
You are officially/unofficially single. You are officially/unofficially not part of a couple. You might not be in a romantic relationship. If you are in a romantic relationship, officially/unofficially, it is not a committed romantic relationship and officially/unofficially, the two of you are not a couple


Stage 1.1: Just Friend Stage
The two of you might or might not have romantic feeling for each other. The two of you might or might not be going out. But even if you two have romantic feeling for each other and even if you two are going out, you two are not officially/unofficially dating or in a romantic relationship, therefore, your act of going out, does not officially/unofficially qualify as a date, it can at most officially/unofficially qualify as friends hanging out and your relationship does not officially/unofficially qualify as a romantic relationship, it can at most officially/unofficially qualify as just friends


Stage 1.2: Just Dating Stage
Stage 1.2.1: Just Dating None Exclusively Stage
The two of you might or might not have romantic feelings for each other. But the two of you are officially/unofficially dating and in a romantic relationship. But your relationship is not officially/unofficially, in a committed relationship, nor are the two of you officially/unofficially a couple. You are just two single people that are officially/unofficially dating none exclusively, it is not officially/unofficially a committed romantic relationship and you are not officially/unofficially a couple, you are just two single people officially/unofficially dating none exclusively, in all ways

Stage 1.2.2: Just Dating Exclusively Stage

The two of you might or might not have romantic feelings for each other. But the two of you are now officially/unofficially in a romantic relationship, where you both officially/unofficially agree not to date other people or to have sex with other people. But this should not be confused as an official/unofficially committed relationship and should not be confused as the two of you, are now officially/unofficially a couple. The two of you are still not officially/unofficially a couple and not officially/unofficially in a committed relationship. Officially/Unofficially, you are two single people, who are in a not committed romantic relationship and is not a couple, but mutually agree not to date other people and not to have sex with other people, only

Stage 2: Couple/Committed Relationship Stage 

You are officially/unofficially not single. You are officially/unofficially part of a couple. You are officially/unofficially in a committed romantic relationship and the two of you are officially/unofficially a couple


Stage 2.1: Just Lovers Stage
Two people agree to officially/unofficially be more then just 2 single people dating but agree to officially/unofficially be a couple and make their romantic relationship, officially/unofficially a committed romantic relationship. (In the none west, especially Asia, it is usually due to two people having a sufficient amount of romantic feeling for each other, want to be together exclusively, as life partner and sexual mate and felt they know each other well enough and long enough, to be in a committed relationship and to be a couple, usually occur, by the time, they felt they can start considering marriage. In the west, usually upon a guy asking a girl out and the girl agree to go out with him, even if they only met for the first time.)


Stage 2.2: Spouse Stage
Stage 2.2.1: De facto Stage

Two people agree to officially/unofficially be more the just to be a couple that is in a committed relationship but officially/unofficially agree to be life partner and each other’s official/unofficially sexual mate, but have not officially/unofficially make it a union, between the two people yet.


Stage 2.2.2: Married Stage

Two people agree to be more the just to be officially/unofficially a couple that is officially/unofficially in a committed relationship but officially/unofficially agree to be life partner and each other’s official/unofficial sexual mate and have agree to officially/unofficially make it a union, between the two people.




  But in western culture, a guy asking a girl out and a girl agreeing to go out with the guy, infer the idea that,

1.       they are now officially/unofficially dating exclusively

2.       they are now officially/unofficially a couple (not spouse stage) and officially/unofficially in an exclusively committed romantic relationship

This is a very unhealthy dating culture. It will be alright if it is for example, you are dating somebody who is your best friend and love of your life for the past 2 years, but you only got together a month ago. But if it is for example, you are dating somebody you only know for a few weeks, on a blind date that is a very different story and it is a very big commitment, to become a couple and enter an exclusively committed romantic relationship with complete stranger, you just met, for example, as far as you know, the guy might be a complete psycho.

Think of it this way, would you marry somebody you just met, for 2 weeks and only been out on two dates, with? Not likely, because most likely, it would be reckless.

This reckless dating culture of the western world, is extremely unhealthy. It would be alright, if you are lucky to meet the right person and the love of your life, but if it is the wrong person, then you just officially enter an exclusively committed romantic relationship/officially become a couple with the wrong person and because you are now officially in a committed relationship, having emotional affair with other people, dating other people officially qualify as cheating. It would be even worse for girls, if he is abusive, because she just officially entered an exclusively committed romantic relationship and officially become a couple with a man who is abusive and because it is officially a committed relationship, having emotional affair with other people, dating other people officially qualify as cheating and if she is one of those Christian girls who think been single is a sin, thus, fear been single, it would be even worse for her, as it give her reason to not leave an abusive relationship, maybe even fear, leaving an abusive relationship, especially if she fear her ability of finding another man, if she leave this relationship, which happens more often then people think, due to most women lack confidence in their appearance (and many abusive men would use her lack of confidence in her appearance and her obsessive desire of having a man, to his advantage to try trap a girl in an abusive relationship)

If two people are is not officially/unofficially in an exclusive romantic relationship and is not officially/unofficially a couple, then, even if they are officially/unofficially in a romantic relationship, she can still go out with other romantic potentials, even if they officially/unofficially agree not to date other people and not to have sex with other people, she can still go out with other romantic potentials, if they don't officially/unofficially agree for it to be dating (if they don't officially/unofficially agree to be dating, it can only officially/unofficially qualify as friends hanging out, thus, it is not officially/unofficially a date, thus, officially/unofficially, it is not cheating) and don't have sex. This would especially be better for girls who fear leaving an abusive relationship due to her Christian value of it is a sin for a woman to remain unwed, thus, fear leaving her current abusive relationship, fearing, she cannot find another man, especially if she lacks confidence in her appearance. Because, this way, at least while continue this abusive romantic relationship, she can still, at the same time, look for other romantic potential and then dump her abusive boy friend, after she found another guy. 


Also, in the western world, a lot of people believe, if a guy asking a girl out and a girl agreeing to go out with the guy and they are now going out and if they are going out, they are officially/unofficially dating, if they are dating, they are now officially/unofficially a couple and is in officially/unofficially an exclusively committed romantic relationship, just not spouse yet. This is also wrong and it is a very problematic and unhealthy view. 

So, Cupid would now tell you what is the correct and healthy view. Just like two people are only officially/unofficially married when both agree to be married

1.  two people are only officially/unofficially in a De Facto Stage, when both agree to be in a De Facto Stage out of their own free will

(So, forcing somebody into the De Facto Stage via blackmail doesn't count)

2. two people are only officially or unofficially in the Couple Stage/Committed Relationship Stage, when they are officially or unofficially married or in a De Facto relationship, or otherwise officially or unofficially mutually agree to be an unwed couple and to be in a officially or unofficially committed romantic relationship, out of their own free will

(So, forcing somebody into the Couple Stage/Committed Relationship Stage via blackmail doesn't count)

3. two people are only officially/unofficially in the Just Dating Exclusively Stage, when both people officially/unofficially agree to be in the Just Dating Exclusively Stage

(So, forcing somebody into the Just Dating Exclusively Stage via blackmail doesn't count)

4. two people are only officially/unofficially at the Dating Stage when both people officially/unofficially agree be in the Dating Stage.

(So, forcing somebody into the Dating Stage via blackmail doesn't count)



Thus, the advice of Cupid is as following

#2

Don’t let other people force you into a stage of a relationship, with a person, you are not comfortable with. If it is meant to be, it is meant to be, if it is not meant to be, it is not meant to be.

(But because the western world currently have the ill culture of  "a guy ask a girl out and the girl agree to go out with the guy, infer the idea they are now officially/unofficially dating and is officially/unofficially a couple and officially/unofficially in a committed exclusive relationship" and too many people believe "If a guy and a girl are going out, they are now officially/unofficially dating and if they are officially/unofficially dating, they are officially/unofficially a couple and officially/unofficially in an exclusive committed relationship" it is important for you to speak up, if you are not ready for that stage of the relationship and want to officially/unofficially be on the just dating none exclusively stage or officially/unofficially just dating exclusively stage or officially/unofficially just friends hanging out stage, to prevent any confusion and misunderstanding, at least until we finally change this unhealthy and problematic dating culture and dating view of the western world)



#3

Instead of officially/unofficially going head first into the couple stage/committed relationship stage of a relationship with a complete stranger from day one and keep trying to make this doom relationship work, try find a relationship that work for you and you enjoy and want to be in, then if both of you want to, officially/unofficially enter the couple stage/committed relationship stage, but once you enter the couple stage/committed relationship you made a commitment, so, think clearly, before you make it, I mean you won’t buy a house, without thinking it through, right?




#4

Just like you are not likely to enter a marriage with a complete stranger, because it is reckless and most likely only enter a marriage with that person, after you get to know him/her well enough. Do not officially/unofficially enter couple/committed relationship stage with a complete stranger and only consider officially/unofficially entering the couple/committed relationship stage, after you know this person well enough. I mean image you started dating a complete stranger you just met in a bar, you don't know this guy, worst case scenario the guy turns out to be a complete psycho, you really need to know a guy a bit better, before you decide whether he is the right guy. So, never do couple at first sight or commitment at first sight, only agree to enter the couple stage and committed relationship stage, with somebody you know, for a while.


(PS: And this advice is not only good for girls. But great for guys, also. Unlike women, which fear been single, most men don't have a problem been a guy that can't get a girl, thus, the possibility of not able to find a girl, does not scare them, thus, they don't fear dumping an abusive girl friend, at the first sight of trouble. But even then, there are lots of guys, with experience with crazy ex-girl friends, because she turns out to be a complete psycho. Thus, a prove that commitment at first sight and couple at first sight, is very bad for men, also and he should get to know her a bit better, before talking about been a couple or making it a commitment)




#5

Another major problem with this whole couple at first sight and commitment at first sight dating culture of the western world, is that it force people to officially/unofficially become a couple and commit, when their relationship is not at that stage yet. Thus, another piece of advice, try avoid officially/unofficially enter a stage of a relationship, if the relationship is not there yet. I mean it is unlikely for you to get marry, to somebody, when your relationship with that person isn't there yet, right? Same applies for all other stages of a relationship.


#6

If you are a girl in an abusive romantic relationship, most likely he doesn't really love you, but for some reason, he just wants to possess you. As explained before, because, many Christian women fear been single, due to their religion believe it is a sin for a woman to remain unwed and she might fear if she leave the current romantic relationship, she cannot find another man. Because the abusive men want to possess her, he might try force her into the couple/committed relationship via blackmail, saying that if she does not agree to enter this stage with him, he will dump her. Thus, if she does not have any other romantic potential out there, she might agree to enter the couple/committed relationship stage out of fear.

So, this is Cupid's advice. As explain before it only count as you agreeing to enter the couple stage/committed relationship stage, marriage stage, de facto stage, dating exclusively stage and dating stage, if you do it, out of your own free will, so blackmail doesn't count. (although marriage got legal complication there, so ethically this marriage doesn't count, but legally it count, so, be careful there) Therefore, you can still date other men and have romantic relationship with other men, if you only agree to be in the couple stage/committed relationship stage with him, as a result of blackmail.


#7

And if you are in an abusive relationship or you found out your boy friend is married, there is nothing unethical about you cheating on your boyfriend or dumping him for another guy, because it is he who first betray your feelings and act in a manner that is  not loyal to you (Chinese refer to people like these as: 無情無義之人 and say people like these are garbage), in such serious manner, thus, make it is alright for you to also betray his feelings and act in a manner that is not loyal to him, by cheating or dumping him for another guy, although it is still better for you to break up with him first, then go find somebody else.

 As for guys, if it is a situation where you are not abusive, but for some reason she felt you are abusive and start cheating on you with other guys or dump you for another guy, you really want this girl, who felt you are abusing her and start cheating or dump you for other guys, as a result?


PS: East Asia got a much healthier dating culture, then the west. In the west the term boy friend/girl friend means two people who are now a couple, but not spouse and people who are just dating are refer to as "just dating, but not on boy friend/ girl friend, term yet.", although western relationship rarely start at the "just dating stage" and just about always start at the "couple stage/committed relationship stage"  In East Asia the term boy friend/ girl friend refer to people who are just dating (regardless of exclusive or none exclusive), but not a couple yet, despite the official legal term for husband and wife are reserve for those who are married, socially, the term husband and wife, is a reference to any relationship that has gone beyond the just dating stage and have enter the couple stage, regardless of whether it is married or de facto and regardless of whether they are spouse or not. However, East Asia people generally start off as just friends, just dating none exclusive and sometime start off as dating exclusively. but rarely do they enter the couple stage, with a complete stranger they barely know and it isn't uncommon for two people to only enter the couple stage, after been dating for over a year or maybe even two years, in other word, they take their time, to get to know each other, before making the decision to enter the couple stage, some even felt the need to take the time to get to know each other a bit better, before deciding to start dating exclusively. 

However, despite the fact people in East Asia, do not enter a committed relationship as easily, as western people, when they do enter a committed relationship they take such commitment much more seriously, then in the west. For example in Taiwan, it can be a civil offense, for a marry man or woman to have an affair, even if they are separated, although the law only legally recognize two people to be having an affair, if your spouse is having sex with another person and only you as the spouse, have the right to initiate the law suit, where you can sue your spouse and/or the person he/she had sex with. The court would determined whether they are having an affair, base on whether they are had sex, during the course of the marriage, so your lawyer need to prove they had sex during the course of the marriage and the lawyer of the accuse need to prove they did not have sex, during the course of the marriage. The court and society both consider the two of you to still be in a committed relationship and is a couple, even if you are separated and you only seize been in a committed relationship and seize been a couple, when your divorce is finalized, so, even if you are separated, dating other people, having sex with other people or having an emotional affair with other people is still consider as unacceptable, (but the court only consider two people to have an affair, if they are caught having sex, so even if they are dating or having an emotional affair, as long as they don't have sex, legally speaking, you don't have a case.)but if you been separated for over three years, you can go to the court and ask the court for a divorce and the court would determined whether you two are separated, base on whether you two been living in the same address for the last three years and if you lived in different address for the last three years, the court would grant the divorce. (And how some western people think it is alright to start dating other people, once they are separated, but not divorce, make Cupid very angry, because, until your divorce is finalized, you are still a couple and in an exclusive committed relationship and those western people who knows been separated, does not make it alright for you to get romantically involved with a person who is married, so don't get romantically involved with them, as a result, make Cupid very happy.) Another example of people from East Asia usually take commitment more seriously then the west, is how in East Asia, once people enter De Facto Relationship, they start considering their spouse's parents as their father in law and mother in law. 

Thus, despite people from East Asia don't enter the couple stage of a relationship or committed relationship stage, in the same easily, unhealthy and reckless manner, as western people, when they do enter the couple stage and committed relationship stage, they take commitment way more seriously then western people. 

How people date in East Asia, is a perfect example of a healthier dating culture, in comparison to the west. 



(This article really used pagan ritual in regards to how asking the gods a question, to ask the Roman God Cupid, whether he approve this advice and the advice is approved by Cupid according to such ritual)




Saturday, February 10, 2018

Cupid's advice to Christian women about how to avoid abusive relationship #1

Hi, I am cupid :)
My Resume...oh, I don't know just the god of love, marriage and relationship for at least the last 2000 years?



Cupid's Advice Number 1

The biggest flaw of Christian women is they are so desperate to have a man, many would put up with abuse, just to have a man. Because the teaching of their religion believes it is wrong for a woman to be single.

So, advice number one, the teaching of your bible is wrong. There is nothing wrong about been single. And it is better to be single and wait for the right guy to come along, then to be in an abusive relationship. And even if you cannot find Mr. Right, it better to be single and have a life, then to be in a relationship with somebody that is abusive. As for the fear of having no kids to take care of you when you get old…I got a secret for you, I invented sperm banks just for those girls who wants a baby, but can’t find Mr. Right!

(Once upon a time, when you are not ready for sperm bank technology, I invented polygamy, now, you are ready for this technology, I am using sperm banks, which work better, to replace polygamy) 

Your destiny and your true love, is in the grand design of the cosmos. If something is meant to be your's, it is your, if something that is not meant to be your, it is not meant to be your and obsess about trying to force something not your, to become your, can only cause you pain and lead you to miss out, on all those beautiful things out there that is your and let all the happiness, you got, slide through your finger and pass you by.

It is alright for a girl wanting to have a man, but don't be obsess with it, when it is time to let go, it is time to let go. 

(PS: And here is a secret, good girls who are patient and not obsess with having a man, got a better chance to find Mr. Right. Girls that are not patient and jump on board with the first guy she find and so obsess with having a man, she is afraid to break up, when the relationship is not right, are lease likely to find Mr. Right and more likely to end up in abusive relationships, because more often then less, your Mr. Right is not the first guy that comes along, when you are single, he might even be somebody who comes along, when you are desperately clinching onto a relationship, just to have a man and the first guy that comes along or that relationship you are so desperate to clinch onto, due to the fear of having no man, might turn out to be abusive)

(PPS: Even when a relationship is not abusive, clinching onto a relationship that is not right, just to have a man, is unfair to both you and your partner. Because you deserve to be with somebody you want to be with, somebody you are happy to be with and your partner, deserve to be with somebody, who is with him, because she wants to be with him, not somebody who is with him, simply because she is afraid to be single.)



Tuesday, February 6, 2018

Is Age of Enlightenment product of Confucius influence undermining Christian value? (Mini video documentary series)


Part 1



Part 2


Part 3

Part 4

Part 5


Part 6


Part 7


Part 8

Yours Truly
Mr. 666 (No bullshit, my birth sign really is 666, born on the sixth of June 6:00AM)

Wednesday, October 11, 2017

Evidence that suggest Roman persecuted Christian is one big lie

For a long time, we hear the Christian story of Christian been persecuted by the evil Roman, for doing the work of god. But is it real? Well, there are increase evidence suggest, not only is it a lie. Instead, Christians were the one who were the real trouble makers. 

We all hear of things such as Inquisition and Crusades during the era where the Catholic Church rule the western world, but evidence suggest these problems exist even in the Roman era, only then the Roman was more powerful, thus, Christian fanatics only get to act like terrorists. 

According to academic Cailian Davenport whose research is funded by the Australia Research Council, there are 0 evidence of Roman persecuting Christians. Roman Emperor Trajan which the Christian world accuse of killing Christians for not worshiping Roman gods, actually once wrote an Imperial decree saying if Christian is not to worship Roman gods, they are not to be punished. In fact, the Roman Empire was known to be an Empire with many different religions and different part of the world, yet, not even once did the Romans every persecuted anybody for not worshiping the religion of Rome. The accusing of Roman throwing Christians into the arena to be eaten by lions, but there are no evidence of that, instead, as we know, people of the ancient days, tend to be more brutal in their execution, the idea is to make such a brutal death a public display, to set an example, to the rest of the people saying "If you committed a crime, you would die via such a brutal method also", And in ancient Rome, get eaten by hungry lions, is simply a form of death penalty, for certain crimes and just because somebody is a Christian, it doesn't mean, he won't be a criminal, conducting crimes such as theft, murder, rape etc. 

With greater reform to the Catholic Church today, since pope Francis took over, even on a Catholic news website, there is a paper published by Charles Mercier questioning whether Emperor Nero really persecuted Christians?

A paper published by Princeton University Professor Brent D. Shaw, also talk about there are no evidence of Romans persecuting Christians, especially, not by Emperor Nero, whom Christianity accused of  been the biggest butcher of Christians. Although there were cases of Emperor Nero executing some Christians for causing the great fire of Rome, it is important to note Emperor Nero never say to execute Christians, instead it said to execute those who cause the fire, if amount those who cause the fire is a group of Christians, naturally they would be executed, but that is not to say Nero executed all Christians. To say that is like saying, Obama bombing ISIS and Taliban today, is Obama bombing and persecuting Muslims. 

So, where did this whole idea of Roman persecuting Christian come from. First, the problem could be within the bible and Christianity itself. Let's take a few examples, 

[Thou shalt not delay to offer the first of thy ripe fruits and of thy liquors: the firstborn of thy sons shalt thou give unto me] (Exodus 22:29)

[The Lord said to Moses "You and Eleazar the priest and the family heads of the community are to count all the people and animals that were captured. Divide the spoils equally between the soldiers who took part in the battle and the rest of the community. From the soldiers who took part in the battle, set apart as tribute for the Lord one out of every five hundred, whether people, cattle, donkeys or sheep. Take this tribute from their half share and give it to Eleazar the priest as the Lord's part. From the Israelites' half, select one out of every fifty, whether people cattle donkeys, sheep or other animals. Give them to the Levites, who are responsible for the care of the Lord's tabernacle. So, Moses and Eleazar the priest did as the Lord commanded Moses. The plunder remaining from the spoils that the soldiers took was 675000 sheep, 72000 cattle, 61000 donkeys and 32000 women who had never slept with a man. The half share of those who fought in the battle was 337500 sheep of which the tribute for the Lord was 375, 36000 cattle of which the tribute for the Lord was 72, 30500 donkeys of which the tribute for the Lord was 61 16000 people of whom the tribute for the Lord was 32.] (Number 31:25~40)

So, despite there are many Christians who claim and believe Christianity is anti-human sacrifice, it is not true, in fact, human sacrifice is an important part of traditional Christian ritual. The idea that Jesus is the ultimate sacrifice to substitute for all sacrifice of all past and future, isn't added into the religion later and it was most likely added by the Romans, in an effort to end human sacrificing amount those early Christians. Rome on the other hand by the era of Juliet Cease, has already outlawed human sacrifice. In Roman paintings there were images of Christians sacrificing their first-born child to the god of Christianity, for many faithful Christians, this have traditionally to be thought of as anti-Christian lies and propaganda, created by the Roman, yet, we are finding within the bible, of Exodus 22:29, where the bible word by word, order Christians to sacrifice their first-born child, to the god of Christianity, upon their birth. This would naturally have led those Christian who sacrifice their first born, to be arrested and punished to the full extent of Roman laws, which, could involve, getting eating by lions in the gladiator arena. 

Let's take another example from the bible

 [But if this charge is true (that she wasn't a virgin on her wedding night) and evidence of the girl's virginity is not found, they shall bring the girl to the entrance of her father's house and there her townsman shall stone her to death, because she committed a crime against Israel by her unchasteness in her father's house. Thus, shall you purge the evil from your midst.] (Deuteronomy 22:20~21)

Now, Rome was an era of sexual liberation, even today in the 21st century, we find it outrage to persecute women for pre-marital sex, let along the extremely sexually liberal Roman Empire. So, is it hard to image, the outrage of Romans, when they see Christians executing women, for having pre-marital sex, in the exact same way, we people today, would be outrage by it? Probably more outrage then we are? So, what would happen to those Christians, who killed the unwed none virgin woman? They will be given the death penalty, thus nail onto the cross or thrown into the gladiator arena to be eaten by lions. 

Let's take another passage from the bible as example

[They entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their fathers, with all their heart and soul; and everyone who would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, was to be put to death, whether small or great, whether man or woman] (Chronicles 15:12~13)

Image a Muslim walk down the streets of the US and killed people for not been a Muslim, would we not execute them. So, what would the Romans do to a Christian who kill people for not been a Christians. The death penalty style, is probably worst then eaten by lion or nail to the cross. According to written record, the people who caused the great Roman fire, Emperor Nero order for them to be skinned alive, before been fed to the lions. 

So, why the Christians still say Romans are persecuting Christians? This is within an important Christian value, Christianity believe the god of Christianity is always right, so, these Christians extremists do not see what they are doing to be evil, but doing something good and just, so, when Romans kill them for doing such evil thing, in their views, the Romans are killing them for doing something good and just, thus, persecution of Christians. In addition, it is important to note, within the bible there are multiple passage that talk about Christians would be persecuted for doing the work of the Christian god. Most Christians, today, thought that is just spreading the religion, but, considering what the bible teach, is it not surprising there are Christians who see killing none Christians, killing non virgins and child sacrifice to be doing the work of the Christian god back then, even today in the 21st century, what about all those Christians fanatics who goes on angry protests saying "god hate fags" and "kill all gays" don't they think what they are doing, to be doing the work of the Christian god and doing something good and just? 

It can also be propaganda, much like how in modern China, the Communist propaganda claim it is the Communist party who defeated Japan in WW2, in the face of the Republic government tyranny and persecution, despite all evidence and people who went through WW2 in China, would tell you it is a lie. And despite we cannot denier during the 19th century, Europe did lots of bad thing, in China the Communist Party fixation on it, a great deal, to create anti western feeling in China. When the Catholic Church was in power, they also need to construct an evil tyrant for the Christians to struggle against and that they chose, was the Romans and Emperor Nero. 

It is also important to note, unlike most ancient countries, where the King or Emperor hold 110% of all legislative power, Roman legislative power compose of both Emperor and Senate, which is where the modern democracy's legislative system is model after. So, Emperor Nero, cannot possibly outlaw Christianity and sentence all people to death for been Christians, even if he wanted to, due to he needed Senate approval, to pass any laws, which make Nero mass murder Christians, even less likely. 

So, what happened in ancient Rome, was not a case of Romans persecuting Christians, it is Christian fanatics doing major act of evil and horror to others, such as mass murder and terrorism and were executed for it and they accuse Romans for persecuting Christians for it.

It is much like how Islamic fanatics today, are getting bomb by the US and its allies, for September Eleven attack and all their terrorist actions, but, in their view, they did nothing wrong and is accusing the US and its allies for persecuting Muslims for it.




http://theconversation.com/mythbusting-ancient-rome-throwing-christians-to-the-lions-67365

http://vridar.org/2015/12/17/the-myth-of-neros-persecution-of-christians/

https://cruxnow.com/commentary/2016/12/18/maybe-nero-didnt-persecute-christians/

Noah's arch disproved